Thursday, 28 July 2011

'CBI raising needless "hue and cry" over Tata'

Former telecom secretary Siddhartha Behura, in jail for his alleged connection to the 2G spectrum scam, Thursday accused the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) of raising an unnecessary "hue and cry" over the Tata group being refused a 2G licence initially.

The CBI had alleged that Tata, which applied for the licence March 4, 2008, had been eliminated in an unfair manner but the group had already admitted that they were late in filing the application. "Then why is the CBI accusing Behura?" the former telecom secretary's lawyer Aman Lekhi asked in the special CBI court.

"I don't understand why there is a hue and cry about Tata. Are they above law and different from other bidders? Does it not amount to dishonesty?" Lekhi, speaking on Behura's behalf, added.

He said it was deputy manager director general of telecom A.K. Srivastava who had supervised all the operations undertake in issuing the licenses.

"It was Srivastava who wrote a letter on Dec 26, 2007, mentioning the policy directive and saying that this would be treated as the final decision… It is on the record," said Lekhi.

"How can Behura be accuse of conspiracy? How does this appeal to common sense?"

The lawyer also argue that it was the responsibility of the Wireless Planning and Coordination (WPC) wing of the telecom subdivision to distribute the licenses and that Behura had no role to play in it.

"Each ministry works with different departments and every department has its own set of everyday jobs… How can he (Behura) be blamed for favouring Swan telecom when he had no role to play?" asked Lekhi.

Behura had Wednesday said the government was responsible for the 2G "mess".

That statement came a day after jailed former relations minister A. Raja dragged Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and then finance minister and present Home Minister P. Chidambaram.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Cabinet approves lokpal bill sketch abandoned by Anna

Manmohan Singh, current prime minister of India.Image via Wikipedia

The Union cabinet on Thursday approved the lokpal bill draft and kept the Prime Minister and the judiciary out of its purview. Anti-corruption activist had pitched for a strong version of the law to set up a lokpal, saying the government draft to be discussed was

"ineffective".
The government had constituted a drafting committee having ministers and members of NGO India Against dishonesty to finalise lokpal bill but they failed to reach a consensus.
After that, the minister finalize a draft lokpal bill for the Cabinet's consideration.
"In its present form, the government's edition of the lokpal bill is too weak and ineffective," social activist Anna Hazare, who was also member of the drafting committee, said on Wednesday.
"It has a very narrow jurisdiction."
Team Anna had demanded inclusion of the Prime Minister, higher judiciary and civil servants in ambit of the planned lokpal, which the ministers did not concur.
Enhanced by Zemanta

As battle begins for innovative CM, can Yeddyurappa get his man in?

After the mining trick claimed the scalp of Karnataka Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa, the question on everyone's lips is whether the BJP high command will completely discount Yeddyurappa's recommendations on his heir in the Lingayat-heavy state Assembly.
The task to choose a leader is tough for central leaders Arun Jaitley and Rajnath Singh who will be in

Bangalore tomorrow to start the selection process.
Among the front-runners is Ananth Kumar -- a Brahmin close to top boss L K Advani -- who has long nurtured the dream to take up the post. Kumar is credited with building the get-together in the state along with Yeddyurappa. With the backing of the RSS, it is understood Kumar has previously asked another possible candidate Jagadish Shettar to step aside for him.
If the BJP is looking for a clean image, then it cannot ignore Kumar's links to the Hudco scam and also with community lobbyist Niira Radia. It is no secret that Yeddyurappa does not like Kumar either.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 27 July 2011

Raja asks court: Why am I the solo target for 2G spectrum scam?

Altered colors as per latest political scenario.Image via Wikipedia

NEW DELHI: An indignant former communications minister A. Raja on Tuesday briefly argued his own case in theCBI court, asking why he alone was being prosecute for the2G spectrum scam.

His lawyer Sushil Kumar was referring to the solicitor general when Raja, a lawyer by training, looked at judge O.P. Saini and asked: "May I?"

When the judge nodded, Raja took on his own defence, loudly and aggressively. The packed courtroom rapidly became very silent, eager to listen to what the now jailedDMK leader had to say.

"All my predecessors maintained the same policy which I worked on," said Raja, exhausting his usual white shirt and black trousers.

"If the CBI is saying ... I am not saying I am guilty but if the CBI says that Raja is guilty or he did any procedural error or a criminal conspiracy, then I will say that the same has been done by Arun Shourie also," he said in the packed courtroom.

Shourie was the communications minister in the BJP-ledNDA regime. The Congress-led UPA ousted the NDA in 2004.

Raja ended his intercession within a few minutes.

"New era" for Pakistan, India dealings, say ministers

Flag of Indian ArmyImage via Wikipedia

By C.J. Kuncheria and Paul de Bendern NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Indian and Pakistani foreign ministers hailed a new era in ties between the nuclear-armed rivals on Wednesday and agreed to fight militancy and boost trade and travel, a step forward in reducing tension in the world's most dangerous region. The comments from Indian Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna and his Pakistani counterpart, Hina Rabbani Khar, were unexpectedly positive and may be a small step towards improving regional constancy, made more urgent with a U.S. troop drawdown in Afghanistan looming. "This is indeed a new era of bilateral cooperation between the two countries," Khar, Pakistan's first female and youngest-ever foreign minister, told the media after two and a half hours of talks, standing next to Krishna. "(It) is our desire, and I believe after having spoken to you, Mr Foreign Minister, that it is the desire of both the governments, to make it an nonstop and an uninterruptable process." Expectations of a breakthrough in peace talks have been low, but the fact the South Asian rivals are talking was a sign that neither side wants to slide back towards conflict. The countries have fought three full-scale wars since winning independence in 1947, two of them over Kashmir, the disputed Himalayan region both claim in full but rule in part. India and Pakistan in February resumed a formal peace process broken off after the 2008 attack on India's financial capital of Mumbai by Pakistan-based militants, which killed 166 people. "We have some distance to travel, but with an open mind and consistent advance, which has been demonstrated in this round of dialogue, I am sure we can reach our desired destination of having a friendly and cooperative relation between our two countries," Krishna said. FIGHTING "TERRORISM" Importantly, they agreed to work more closely to fight militancy, which has plagued both countries, and to bring to justice perpetrators of militant attacks. "We have agreed that terrorism poses a continued threat to peace and security and reiterate the firm and undiluted commitment of our two countries to fight and eliminate this scourge in all forms," Krishna said. "We have also agreed the need to strengthen cooperation in counter-terrorism to bring those responsible for terror crimes to justice." The United States has also stepped up efforts to bridge the divide between the neighbours. U. S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited New Delhi last week and urged them to work on ties as well as stabilising the volatile region. As in previous peace efforts, progress has been slow and vulnerable to any attempts by Pakistan-based militants, fighting Indian security forces in its part of Kashmir, to try to trigger a war by launching another Mumbai-style attack. But both sides kept their cool in the aftermath of a triple bomb attack in Mumbai this month that killed 24 people and hurt more than 130. Police have yet to identify the suspects but security analysts suspect the home-grown Indian Mujahideen. Krishna said the two countries had agreed to implement a series of confidence-building measures, such as relaxing some of the trade and travel restrictions across a ceasefire line dividing Kashmir. Peace across the heavily militarised frontier between India and Pakistan is crucial for the United States to draw-down troops and stabilise Afghanistan without sparking off a proxy war between New Delhi and Islamabad in that country. The two countries also agreed to continue talking on Kashmir, an issue that Pakistan is keen to move forward on. "We will continue discussions (on Kashmir) with a view to find a peaceful solution by narrowing divergence and building convergences," Krishna said. (Additional reporting by Annie Banerji and James Pomfret in NEW DELHI; Editing by Robert Birsel)

Bharti Airtel raises tariffs by 20-50%, others to track outfit

Wordmark of Bharti Airtel. Trademarked by Bhar...Image via Wikipedia

NEW DELHI:Bharti Airtel has increased call tariffs by 20-50% in some regions of the country - a move that may change market dynamics, as it marks the first hike by an incumbent operator in three years.

Industry executives say Bharti will extend the price hike to other parts of the country soon and also added that its most important competitors in theGSM space -Vodafone Essar andIdea Cellular - are expected to follow suit. The six regions where Bharti has improved local and long distance call rates include Delhi, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat.

The savage price war, that has plagued the sector for the past two years, has resulted in Indian consumers enjoying rock bottom tariffs - the lowest in the world. The tariff cuts also destroyed the success of most mobile phone companies in the 14-player market. It resulted in the industry's revenues being torpid for the last two years in spite of the sector adding over 400 million new customers during this period.

Bharti is also the second major operator to increase call rates over the last couple of weeks.

Tata TeleServices, which had unleashed the price war with its per-second billing-based GSM offering about two years ago, recently doubled STD call charges for new subscribers after a year of connection and raised local and state SMS charges by 67% and 25% respectively.

"Most operators have done whatever they could to optimise costs; they have reached the bottom of the pit. I am pretty sure that (after Bharti) others will raise call tariffs too but it will be difficult to predict by how much," said Ernst & Young's vice-president fortelecom transaction advisory practiceAkshay Grover.

In recent times, in the Mumbai region, most operators, including Bharti Airtel, Vodafone Essar and Idea Cellular, increased long-distance or STD calls tariffs.

A Bharti Airtel spokesperson set the rise in tariffs on Friday and said the company was left with limited options but to raise tariffs while also blame increasing inflation

2G case: Name exhausted continues as Behura names RBI governor

India's Minister of Finance Palaniappan Chidam...Image via Wikipedia

NEW DELHI: Jailed former Telecom Secretary Siddhartha Behura today draggedRBI GovernorD Subbarao in the2G case critical him of not revising the spectrum licence fee and claimed he had no role to play except implement the government's policy.

Behura's submission before a court targeting the former Finance Secretary reflected the trend of the 2G scam accuse naming top leaders and officials after past Telecom Miniser A Raja named Prime MinisterManmohan Singh, Home MinisterP Chidambaram and Attorney General G E Vahanvati over the last two days.

Conflicting the framing of charges of corruption and other penal offences against him in the case, Behura told the Special CBI judge O P Saini that Subbarao had decided next to revising the entry fee of Rs 1,659 crore for 2G licence and if he is not an accused in this case, he (Behura) too should not have been put on trial.

"Subbarao finalised the result taken in the meeting of December 4, 2007 that the policy stood approved and the entry fees (of Rs 1,659 crore fixed in 2001 during NDA's regime) need not be revised," Behura's counsel Aman Lekhi told the court. Behura is behind bars for the past six months.

"Even the Finance Minister (then P Chidambaram) was also present in the meeting (held on December 4, 2007). If Subbarao, who was part of the Finance Ministry, did commit no wrong, how come I did it.

Going by the same principle, if I have been made an accused then Subbarao should also be made an accused," he said.

The former official defended himself against the charges against him, saying the acts done by him were in pursuance of the government policy and he did not commit any wrong that caused a loss to the exchequer.

Asserting that there was "not an iota of confirmation" against him, Behura said he was only a civil servant who had no role to play except implementing the government's policy.

Chitika

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites